{"id":4244,"date":"2023-12-27T13:50:22","date_gmt":"2023-12-27T13:50:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/?p=4244"},"modified":"2023-12-27T13:50:22","modified_gmt":"2023-12-27T13:50:22","slug":"happy-birthday-royal-oak-hands-on-with-the-gold-royal-oak-jumbo-16202","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/?p=4244","title":{"rendered":"Happy Birthday, Royal Oak! \u2014 Hands-On With The Gold Royal Oak “Jumbo” 16202"},"content":{"rendered":"

Exactly 50 years ago today in Basel, Switzerland, Audemars Piguet introduced the Royal Oak. You can read the background on the original Royal Oak 5402 here, as well as all models that succeeded it up till today\u2019s Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d 16202.<\/p>\n

What better way to celebrate an anniversary with a very special watch? Meet the Royal Oak 16202 in pink gold, also known as the 16202OR.OO.1240OR.01. We already announced this new reference last January as the worthy successor of the 15202 in rose gold. But for this special occasion, we go hands-on with this beauty from Audemars Piguet.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d 16202<\/h2>\n

This 39mm Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d, or Extra-Thin, marks the 50th anniversary of the icon designed by G\u00e9rald Genta. Audemars Piguet decided to create a special rotor for this year\u2019s Royal Oak models indicating the 50th anniversary of the watch. But AP will only produce these rotors for one year, putting a high standard in place for its weight-mass decoration. So next year, the 16202 will still be there, but without this special decorative rotor.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Only 8.1mm in height<\/p>\n

Homecoming<\/h3>\n

Some of you might remember \u2014 if you\u2019ve been following us for a while \u2014 that I used to own the Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d reference 15202. I sold it a few years ago (no regrets, though) to fund something else. But I vividly remember wearing the 15202 for many years. It used to be my daily beater for a long time, as snobbish as that may sound. Things looked different back then (2009\u20132019), as the demand for these watches wasn\u2019t incredibly high. Prices were even lower than what you\u2019d pay for a Rolex Datejust these days.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

My, how things can change in such a relatively short amount of time! Anyway, the Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d I wore back then didn\u2019t look or wear very differently from the new 16202. Wearing this new model felt a bit like coming home, but with one significant difference. The 16202 I\u2019ve been wearing for this article is made of gold. Yes, gold, baby! The heft is noticeably different than that of the steel version. Besides that, the wrist presence is simply amazing.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The 16202OR<\/h2>\n

The 18K pink gold version has this smoked slate-gray dial featuring the famous \u201cPetite Tapisserie\u201d motif. This was something that was outsourced on the version I used to own. However, since 2012 or so, Audemars Piguet has brought the craftsmanship and production of these dials back in-house. That same year, AP also moved its logo to the 6-o\u2019clock position. Before that, and since the \u201980s, it had sat at 12 o\u2019clock.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The smoked dial looks so stunning with the pink gold, I feel it\u2019s one of the main attractions of this version for me. Another version with a smoked dial is the yellow gold 16202BA, as well as the platinum 16202PT with a smoked green dial. The latter comes without the iconic \u201cPetite Tapisserie\u201d motif, though. For me, it\u2019s between the pink gold and the yellow gold versions. Honestly, I\u2019d have a hard time choosing which I\u2019d wear more. That said, I don\u2019t need to because there\u2019s this pink gold 16202OR in front of me. It\u2019s the version that AP had available for our review, so thankfully, that makes things easy.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t#gallery-1 {
\n\t\t\t\tmargin: auto;
\n\t\t\t}
\n\t\t\t#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
\n\t\t\t\tfloat: left;
\n\t\t\t\tmargin-top: 10px;
\n\t\t\t\ttext-align: center;
\n\t\t\t\twidth: 50%;
\n\t\t\t}
\n\t\t\t#gallery-1 img {
\n\t\t\t\tborder: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
\n\t\t\t}
\n\t\t\t#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
\n\t\t\t\tmargin-left: 0;
\n\t\t\t}
\n\t\t\t\/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes\/media.php *\/<\/p>\n

\n
\n\n<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
\n\n<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n


<\/p>\n

From 15300 to 15202<\/h2>\n

In terms of dimensions, not much has changed. The Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d ref. 16202 has the same old 39mm diameter and measures only 8mm in height. What changed, however, is what got me into buying the 15202 in the first place \u2014 the movement.<\/p>\n

Before I bought the Royal Oak 15202, I had owned the reference 15300. This Royal Oak model, also 39mm, came out in 2005 and housed the AP in-house caliber 3120. That watch had a bit more body, a thicker bracelet, and a double-folding clasp. Compared to the 15202, even though the diameter was equal, it was a bit of a Royal Oak on steroids (or sugar) \u2014 a bit fat. But I liked it, and I had it for about a year or two, max. Looking at the 15202, however, I realized there\u2019s only one Royal Oak for me. It was the \u201cJumbo\u201d with its super-slim case. And that case was only possible due to the extra-thin (3.05mm) movement.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Caliber 2121<\/p>\n

Inside the original \u201cJumbo\u201d was caliber 2121. It was based on Jaeger-LeCoultre\u2019s caliber 920 and used since the original Royal Oak reference 5402. Vacheron Constantin also used it for its model 222, and Patek Philippe did for the first Nautilus reference 3700\/1A. Jaeger-LeCoultre itself never used it, and at some point, the license to manufacture the movement was transferred to Audemars Piguet. To make a long story short, the caliber 2121 was one of the main reasons for me to \u201cupgrade\u201d to the Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d. Not only because it made the case thinner than the one on the Royal Oak reference 15300, but also because I felt that the caliber 2121 was one of the most beautiful self-winding movements out there.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Caliber 7121 replaces 2121<\/p>\n

Instead of using ball bearings, the rotor glides on a rail, and it has a variable-inertia Gyromax balance wheel. And though, technically, Patek Philippe owns the rights to the Gyromax name, I will use the word anyway, as it\u2019s the exact same construction. By adjusting the eight masses located on top of the wheel, a watchmaker can more accurately regulate the wheel\u2019s balance. What I didn\u2019t know until I visited the Audemars Piguet manufacture a few years ago was that this movement was hand-finished, unlike the caliber 3120.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Caliber 7121<\/h2>\n

Anyway, the caliber 2121 is no longer. The new Royal Oak 16202 reference uses the 7121. It has a higher frequency than its predecessor (28,800vph instead of 21,600vph), and a 55-hour power reserve instead of 40 hours. To be honest, I don\u2019t care too much about these numbers. Rather, what I never liked about the previous movement was the lack of a quick-set date. It was incredibly annoying, but luckily, Audemars Piguet fixed that with this new 7121 movement. The ball bearings are back for the rotor, though, and the movement\u2019s thickness has increased from 3.05mm to 3.2mm. According to Audemars Piguet, the introduction of caliber 7121 marks a new generation of movements. I assume that means it will be the base for future watches with complications.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

That bracelet is just awesome<\/h2>\n

Just like its predecessor(s), the integrated bracelet is razor-sharp when it comes to finishing, but wears incredibly comfortable. There are only a few bracelets that come even close to the level of comfort that AP offers with the Royal Oak bracelet. Vacheron\u2019s 222 bracelet that was introduced just the other week in Geneva does feel good, but I\u2019d like to spend some more time with it to come up with a definitive answer. Patek\u2019s Nautilus bracelet is another bracelet that comes close, but the Royal Oak bracelet does the \u201cintegrated\u201d job a bit better. The double-folding clasp is not something I prefer over the one that was used pre-2012, but it does the job properly and feels more solid than the single-folding clasp.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The 16202 \u201cJumbo\u201d on the wrist<\/h2>\n

Putting the Royal Oak \u201cJumbo\u201d 16202 on your wrist, especially in gold, is something special. It\u2019s a sensation that is difficult to describe in words, and if possible, I urge you to visit an AP House and give it a try yourself. It\u2019s a watch that needs to be tried before you buy one. That said, even in gold, I find it a very easy watch to wear with its modest dimensions and thin (8.1mm) case.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And you don\u2019t need to be worried about scratching the bracelet or case, because scratches will appear sooner or later anyway. You just need to be prepared to live with that fact. In the end, I think scratches give character and show you wear and enjoy the Royal Oak.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Price and availability of the 16202<\/h2>\n

The CHF 63,100<\/strong> price tag puts me back on the ground immediately. I will never spend this much on a watch, even if my watch budget allowed it. Yes, I could sell off some pieces to get the job done, but there\u2019s this inner voice that always tries to reason with me. The steel version though, which retails for approximately half of this amount, could be something that works for me. I thought I didn\u2019t miss my Royal Oak 15202, but wearing this 16202 surely put some doubt in my mind. Aside from the price tag on these Royal Oak watches nowadays, it\u2019s the lack of availability that comes into play as well. Oh well\u2026 perhaps one day. Anyway, happy birthday, Royal Oak! And here\u2019s to many more!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Exactly 50 years ago today in Basel, Switzerland, Audemars Piguet introduced the Royal Oak. You can read the background on the original…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4245,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[23],"tags":[417,379,418,419,381],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4244"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4244\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sportandhealthy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}